Friday, November 1, 2019

Utilitarianism and Deontology Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Utilitarianism and Deontology - Assignment Example There are many different philosophical perspectives that one could apply to the issue of human cloning; it is the utilitarian and deontological perspective that offer two interesting comparative views. Human cloning has dominated science fiction for decades with scenarios revealing how the practice could go terribly wrong. Ethical debates have proposed many other unique issues with cloning; everything from the development of unforeseen genetic flaws, to the devaluation of life, to whether, or not, a cloned being will have rights and even a soul. (McGee) However, it is the incredible potential of medical â€Å"miracles† that cloning might allow, in all its forms, which includes, ending infertility, eradicating genetic diseases, curing illnesses, replacing damaged organs, and last but not least, the ability to create life as they see fit, that continues to lure supporters. The potential positives and plausible negatives of human cloning are not an easy controversy to weigh. Utilitarianism essentially takes an ultimate stand of; do the ends justify the means? The philosophy cares less about how you accomplish something as long as the overall outcome leads to the greatest amount of overall good and happiness. (Moreland 1) While deontology considers less the outcomes and more about the intention behind doing it. The moral intent is more important in deciding whether something is good or bad, or right or wrong, has greater than the outcomes and results. The ideology embraces the â€Å"Categorical Imperatives,† which include a "universality" within the principles, all humans are rational agents, and must be treated as such.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.